Jump to content

Everton 2 Chelsea 0


JaneB

Matchday prediction  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. What will the result be?

    • Everton win
      19
    • Draw
      4
    • Chelsea win
      8


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mark Kelly said:

It's just one meaningless soundbite after another , it's exactly the same sentiment he used a few days after the Newcastle debacle , his own innate negativity and cowardice are rubbing off on the players and now they're scared too.

Nothing innate about it. If you were to poll 100 football fans and ask them to criticise Pochettino's pre-Chelsea football, I'm completely confident 90 of them would be talking about it being gung ho and overly aggressive. 

These players don't seem to be able to get 5 yards into the oppo half without conceding. That may well be Pochettino's coaching, but it isn't his mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Max Fowler said:

. Road runners like Sterling and Mudryk require the team playing well to shine, likewise Enzo and Caicedo coping in midfield. 

We paid record breaking fees for Enzo and Casicedo to be game changers for us, so what you say here is actually pretty damming on their contributions to the team. We should be paying average fees for average  players who need to be in a good team playing well to look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, boratsbrother said:

We paid record breaking fees for Enzo and Casicedo to be game changers for us, so what you say here is actually pretty damming on their contributions to the team. We should be paying average fees for average  players who need to be in a good team playing well to look good.

It's not that they can't carry the squad in future - it's that they are too young and new to the team/league to do it all by themselves right now. Hence why Gallagher elevates them both so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, thevelourfog said:

Nothing innate about it. If you were to poll 100 football fans and ask them to criticise Pochettino's pre-Chelsea football, I'm completely confident 90 of them would be talking about it being gung ho and overly aggressive. 

These players don't seem to be able to get 5 yards into the oppo half without conceding. That may well be Pochettino's coaching, but it isn't his mindset.

The problem for me is he's been hinting at a mentality problem all season with increasing intensity - now it's reached a crux point where we really need to match the opposition in terms of effort and determination? This should have been the standard set from day one - as Poch has began to "crack the whip", all we have seen is us move to the top of the yellow card league.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Max Fowler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poch is at fault for some elements of the abject displays we’re currently, but it’s also just down to the make up of the squad; we massively lack leaders and players that wouldn’t allow standards to slip or effort to drop this low. It’s a problem we’ve had for a while to be fair, before the new owners went through the ‘rebuild’. Until that is rectified with a few signings based on personality rather than potential, we won’t improve and won’t see any progress towards a consistent work rate level and fight and determination throughout the squad, regardless of who the manager is.

I’ve said it so many times that I’m bored of hearing it, but we would have been so much better off buying a 3/4 players with experience of this league at a lower level of perceived quality who had the mentality required instead of 5/6 of the youngsters we signed. The balance is completely off in our squad in terms of experience. 

I honestly think we’d be in a better position now if we had signed (for example) Dunk, Henderson, Willian and Calvert-Lewin instead of (for example) Disasi, Ugochukwu, Mudryk and Jackson. But these players have little to no sell on value and so were of no interest to us. The irony is, the squad that’s been assembled is going to plummet down this league and be stuck there for many years, without some big adjustments and therefore our revenue will massively drop. 

Admittedly, it could pay off and in a few years once this team has the experience it may click and we may fly back up the league, but I can’t see it and it’s an incredibly high risk strategy in a ruthless industry and in the toughest league in the world.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Max Fowler said:

The problem for me is he's been hinting at a mentality problem all season with increasing intensity - now it's reached a crux point where we really need to match the opposition in terms of effort and determination? This should have been the standard set from day one - as Poch has began to "crack the whip", all we have seen is us move to the top of the yellow card league.

 

 

 

 

In Poch’s defence I believe him. I think he DOES care.  Saying that we’ll be lucky to get nil today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thevelourfog said:

Nothing innate about it. If you were to poll 100 football fans and ask them to criticise Pochettino's pre-Chelsea football, I'm completely confident 90 of them would be talking about it being gung ho and overly aggressive. 

These players don't seem to be able to get 5 yards into the oppo half without conceding. That may well be Pochettino's coaching, but it isn't his mindset.

It's meant , not in the strictest sense of the word more that he always seems overly concerned with what the opposition will do to us than what he can do to the opposition.

As an example , even when we had both James and Chilwell fit at the same time (imagine that!) He chose instead to play Chilwell on the left wing instead of left wing back so he could play Colwill at left back and then instructed Colwill not to overlap because he was scared we'd be left exposed . Bringing the worst out of both Colwill , and Chilwell and negating the effect of our attack , he continued this with Mudryk who was expected to defend but he never allowed Colwill to help him when we attacked , again because he was scared .

Edited by Mark Kelly
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chelsea_Matt said:

In Poch’s defence I believe him. I think he DOES care.  Saying that we’ll be lucky to get nil today. 

It's not about caring. I believe he cares too. It's about setting standards and being able to get a tune out of the players - on the ball and off the ball. Hearing from Poch with ever-increasing intensity about the fact that we should be competing is all well and good, but this should have been the focus from day one. I don't believe it was.

I don't believe there has been the pressure on these players from Poch or the club in general, so when he has started "cracking the whip", we have seen his cries for more passion manifest in rank ill-discipline. Either we go completely missing in games or shoot ourselves in the foot with needless red cards and suspensions.

He is unable to find the balance between support and pressure. When he is too supportive the players aren't on the edge that's required, when he puts pressure on them they go over it. The players and especially the club deserve criticism for this losing mentality, but ultimately Poch is also failing to inspire our squad correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mark Kelly said:

It's meant , not in the strictest sense of the word more that he always seems overly concerned with what the opposition will do to us than what he can do to the opposition.

As an example , even when we had both James and Chilwell fit at the same time (imagine that!) He chose instead to play Chilwell on the left wing instead of left wing back so he could play Colwill at left back and then instructed Colwill not to overlap because he was scared we'd be left exposed . Bringing the worst out of both Colwill , and Chilwell and negating the effect of our attack , he continued this with Mudryk who was expected to defend but he never allowed Colwill to help him when we attacked , again because he was scared .

Maybe he isn’t scared - but just sees how weak, spineless, entitled, stupid, soft and pathetic the players are.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, My Blood Is Blue said:

Poch is at fault for some elements of the abject displays we’re currently, but it’s also just down to the make up of the squad; we massively lack leaders and players that wouldn’t allow standards to slip or effort to drop this low. It’s a problem we’ve had for a while to be fair, before the new owners went through the ‘rebuild’. Until that is rectified with a few signings based on personality rather than potential, we won’t improve and won’t see any progress towards a consistent work rate level and fight and determination throughout the squad, regardless of who the manager is.

I’ve said it so many times that I’m bored of hearing it, but we would have been so much better off buying a 3/4 players with experience of this league at a lower level of perceived quality who had the mentality required instead of 5/6 of the youngsters we signed. The balance is completely off in our squad in terms of experience. 

I honestly think we’d be in a better position now if we had signed (for example) Dunk, Henderson, Willian and Calvert-Lewin instead of (for example) Disasi, Ugochukwu, Mudryk and Jackson. But these players have little to no sell on value and so were of no interest to us. The irony is, the squad that’s been assembled is going to plummet down this league and be stuck there for many years, without some big adjustments and therefore our revenue will massively drop. 

Admittedly, it could pay off and in a few years once this team has the experience it may click and we may fly back up the league, but I can’t see it and it’s an incredibly high risk strategy in a ruthless industry and in the toughest league in the world.

I agree with all that except" it could pay off"  "in a few years" which i really doubt.  Congratulations fellow posters and fans who hang on for a while - we really are here when CFC is sh1t.

and except this

1 hour ago, My Blood Is Blue said:

It’s a problem we’ve had for a while to be fair, before the new owners went through the ‘rebuild’.

Mount, Kovacic, Azpi, Jorginho, Rudiger, Alonso were all playing to summer 2022 and were all committed players who played for the team.  Boosted by Kante prior to his injury period.
In Summer 2022 we kept some balance with Koulibaly and Sterling. Aubameyang, Zakaria, Felix, Cucurella, while Fernandez and Fofana had some miles on the clock.
The real dependence on naive youth started this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, east lower said:

That’s a side that’s saying either my job is completely secure or sack me!

I'd say it was a side that says "I don't trust any of my players beyond one bad game".
It also says I don't want a squad of 19 year old maybes.  Anyone noticed how a squad with a sizeable contingent of teenaged S Americans, none of them ever get beyond the bench?  The same 14 or 15 players get shuffled around.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dwmh said:

I'd say it was a side that says "I don't trust any of my players beyond one bad game".
It also says I don't want a squad of 19 year old maybes.  Anyone noticed how a squad with a sizeable contingent of teenaged S Americans, none of them ever get beyond the bench?  The same 14 or 15 players get shuffled around.

As I’ve said above - I think he sees how utterly weak, lazy, entitled and stupid the players are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Original 21 said:

Let’s hope it’s not just shuffling the deck chairs on a sinking ship.  

Horrible feeling that it is exactly that.

13 minutes ago, Dwmh said:

I'd say it was a side that says "I don't trust any of my players beyond one bad game".
It also says I don't want a squad of 19 year old maybes.  Anyone noticed how a squad with a sizeable contingent of teenaged S Americans, none of them ever get beyond the bench?  The same 14 or 15 players get shuffled around.

And if you don’t trust 50%+ of your players then it’s a massive issue. 
 

TBF most of the young S.American’s are on loan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Dwmh said:

I'd say it was a side that says "I don't trust any of my players beyond one bad game".
It also says I don't want a squad of 19 year old maybes.  Anyone noticed how a squad with a sizeable contingent of teenaged S Americans, none of them ever get beyond the bench?  The same 14 or 15 players get shuffled around.

But he trusts Sanchez? Hmmmmm

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, east lower said:

Just a thought, the regular changing of the back 4 or 5 with different systems can’t help.

Best defences are ones that get used to playing together. You can then tweak here and there for different opponents.

Quite. We have had some nice, stable and terrific pairs of central backs in our recent history (since Vialli's era and up until Mourinho). 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, My Blood Is Blue said:

 

As always with our club, my biggest question when seeing the team is… where are the goals coming from?!

But it's no longer just a question of where our goals are coming from. We've become just as poor in defence and if we play like we did on Wednesday we could lose by 5 today.

Edited by boratsbrother
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...