Jump to content

Chelsea 1 Nottingham Forest 1


JaneB
Message added by My Blood Is Blue,

Matchday prediction  

16 members have voted

  1. 1. What will the result be?

    • Chelsea win
      10
    • Draw
      6
    • Nottingham Forest win
      1

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 06/10/24 at 12:00

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Siidi said:

Chukwuemeka hasn't looked bad the odd occasions he's played. I really like the intensity and directness that Lavia brings. With him and Caicedo there's more grit to our midfield. But I just get this feeling that as long as Enzo is around, he'd be chosen, no matter how poorly he plays. 

Fernandez was a complete passenger as soon the tempo of the game increased and Forest decided that attacking us was a good idea. I.e for the whole of the second-half. 

Caicedo drove us forward constantly in the second half. 

But, like you my feelings are that there’s one, very unjustified name on the team sheet after Palmer. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Proud-Blue said:

 

We're sitting in fourth at the moment before this international break. I think the vast majority of us would have taken that. The challenge now will be holding that position given some really tough fixtures coming up.

 

Could have been better but Sanchez has made some big saves in recent games which won us points, so our position could easily be worse too. So overall we should be satisfied with the season so far. Also, we've not exactly  been very  good at chasing the pack after poor starts, so we have to take the decent as an extra good sign so far.

Got a nice points gap over Utd. They will improve but it's already looking tough for them. Newcastle will be roughly where they were last season. Spurs can look very good in patches but equally bad in others, so who knows about them. Villa are the most consistent team of those chasing 4th. I hope they do well in the CL as I think it could drain them a little as the season progresses.

 

I'd like to add that I thought it was another entertaining game today. I'm getting a bit too long in the tooth to just want to see winning football at any cost all of the time. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bones said:

I agree with time wasting,  but we had 13mins added on. I was positively suprised with that. Not sure what else ref could have done.

Given them a few more yellows for the blatant cheating. Their keeper pretending to be knocked out after clashing with his own defender and wasting 5 minutes, sending off whoever it was that blatantly tripped Cucurella up which caused the melee that wasted another 5 minutes. Their shithousery took cheating to a whole new level.

Edited by chrisb
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And most of that 13 minutes was down to the genuine injury that Gibbs-White suffered after Gusto blocked his shot and the time taken to treat him on the pitch then get him off, and then somehow not restart the game until their sub who was still wearing his tracksuit when Gibbs-White left the pitch was allowed to come on.  The officiating was utterly crap as per usual. What happened to the concussion rule? If Sels was knocked out as he appeared to be, surely he should have been substituted for safety reasons? No, he miraculously recovered after 5 minutes and was able to pull off a couple of worldies. Utterly disappointed in Forest and their “tactics” and Kavanagh for letting them get away with it.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@chrisb...Already made my feelings clear about the "KO" but on reflection I really think the Powers should look at the whole incident again,,,as I recall there was no instance rush to the keeper as one would expect if a serious head injury had occurred and the theatrical opening of his eyes was,on tv, comical,,BUT with the concussion protocol. a must, it could put doubt in an official's mind and a delay urgent medical attention...I have no need to remind anyone about a referee putting a keeper's life in danger,,what a contrast.. no card for a fake injury and a referee who nearly caused a death by his arrogance.

I watch keepers closely both ends and knew he wasn't injured, With Tv it's easier to see than on the pitch but again  disgraceful,,,

The Guardian suggesting Jackson's behaviour needs reviewing seem to have missed Sels behaviour...sad because he earned his money but for me shamed himself.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, east lower said:

Fernandez was a complete passenger as soon the tempo of the game increased and Forest decided that attacking us was a good idea. I.e for the whole of the second-half. 

 

 

 

If we had a defensive unit as good as we had 20 years ago, then we could accommodate a player as unathletic as Enzo. Sadly we don't, so too many times Enzo's lack of athleticism costs us in midfield. Putting Lavia in behind him would certainly help, but that would leave us a player short going forward and we certainly shouldn't be tampering with the best part of our team, so the long-term solution has to be to not start games with Enzo, at least in a good number of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, boratsbrother said:

I think Chuck deserves more game time than he's getting. 

In fairness, when opportunities have been there for Chukwuemeka he's either been injured or sick.

Even then, he's not a CM regardless, so to get him into the side it's gotta come at the expense of either Palmer, Sancho, Neto, Madueke, Felix or Mudryk - with some of those already getting slim minutes as it is themselves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, boratsbrother said:

If we had a defensive unit as good as we had 20 years ago, then we could accommodate a player as unathletic as Enzo. Sadly we don't, so too many times Enzo's lack of athleticism costs us in midfield. Putting Lavia in behind him would certainly help, but that would leave us a player short going forward and we certainly shouldn't be tampering with the best part of our team, so the long-term solution has to be to not start games with Enzo, at least in a good number of games.

20 years ago we also played with an extra man in midfield, with one of the three also designed a specific defensive role that consisted of sitting in front of the defence and shielding it. Not only do we now play with one less body, but there is no bonafide holding midfielder anymore. 

There's a lot more demand placed on a player like Caicedo in this day and age, someone tasked with doing a lot of defensive work but still also pushing up himself in the press. A lot of occasions BOTH Enzo and Caicedo are upfield and that allows the opposition to get in between the midfield and defensive line too easily, so it's not just an Enzo specific problem per se. 

The remedy is a bonafide holding midfielder that purely sits, but teams don't really want that anymore in a lot of cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of 18 very winnable points we’ve managed 14. The real test starts now with a run of games;

Liverpool (a)

(Panathinaikos (a))

Newcastle (h)

(Newcastle (a))

Man U (a)

(FC Noah (h))

Arsenal (h)

Leicester (a)

(Heidenheim (a))

Aston Villa (h)

Southampton (a)

Tottenham (a)

That’s 8 rather tough PL fixtures or 24 points on the table. This is the make or break period for our season. 16+ points and we will be genuine challengers for a top four - maybe even top three. 10 or less and we will be fighting for 5-7th. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, xceleryx said:

 

The remedy is a bonafide holding midfielder that purely sits, but teams don't really want that anymore in a lot of cases. 

 

I don't know if we (the team/coach, whatever) wants this, but it's clearly what we need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Proud-Blue said:

A frustrating result, although the performance wasn't too bad.

 

Yes, not actually that different to a few other games we have won, but without taking chances

10 hours ago, CarefreeMuratcan said:

Beyond the time wasting, my concern is that attacking momentum is allowed to be broken up as well by not returning the ball to play quickly enough. The symbolic yellow card for a goalkeeper time wasting needs to be followed up with a second yellow and not only done for show. 

Yes. 

From the point we equalised, there was no continuity of play. time wasting. feigning injury. 

 

10 hours ago, east lower said:

And it also needs to happen well before sometime after 80 minutes generally. 

But that takes bravery and ownership of the issue and NONE of the referees have any of those qualities.

think is was minute 85 yesterday. that learned him. he then kept doing it. 

  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, paulw66 said:

Yes, not actually that different to a few other games we have won, but without taking chances

Yes. 

From the point we equalised, there was no continuity of play. time wasting. feigning injury. 

 

think is was minute 85 yesterday. that learned him. he then kept doing it. 

Honestly for me it's not even that we dropped 2 points. It's the entertainment factor taking a huge hit from this nonsense.

If you ask me they should bring in some sort of throw in/free kick/goal kick clock that works similarly to how goalkeepers need to release the ball from their hands within 8 seconds (or whatever it is). And it needs to be enforced. Had enough of this nonsense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, boratsbrother said:

I think Chuck deserves more game time than he's getting. 

No way would I start Enzo away to Liverpool. I see us being over run if we do. Lavia must start imo.

I'd also give Mudryk a start in that game. Thought he looked pretty sharp today. Also good to see Enzo hasn' t frozen him out as it sounded like he was going to a while ago. 

No matter what others think I always maintain there is a decent winger in  Mudryk. If I were coaching him I would advise him to cut out the complex dribbling which as we know is overrated in the modern game. 9 out of 10 times you either lose the ball or you end up dribbling your own teammates, and still lose the ball.

Mudryk should perfect beating the offside trap from the shoulder of the fullback and polishing up his crosses - low, high, short, long, etc. He did just that yesterday, and I count that as an assist missed by João Felix. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Holymoly said:

See? Told you. That's a lesson learned.

We give up too many good chances for me to ever be confident about winning a league game. That said, we are also far from the only team which does that these days, even City do it. Liverpool are the only team looking solid with   two goals conceded so far and if they keep being that tight they'll be certs for the league.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Siidi said:

No matter what others think I always maintain there is a decent winger in  Mudryk. If I were coaching him I would advise him to cut out the complex dribbling which as we know is overrated in the modern game. 9 out of 10 times you either lose the ball or you end up dribbling your own teammates, and still lose the ball.

Mudryk should perfect beating the offside trap from the shoulder of the fullback and polishing up his crosses - low, high, short, long, etc. He did just that yesterday, and I count that as an assist missed by João Felix. 

He drives me mad because like you I'm still  convinced there's a good player there.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of ok with a point in the end - had the chances to win it but equally could have been sucker punched.

I think getting a win at Anfield will be massive for us and our season. Some tougher games coming up so we don't want to slip too far behind any of the teams below us.

2 hours ago, Siidi said:

Mudryk should perfect beating the offside trap from the shoulder of the fullback and polishing up his crosses - low, high, short, long, etc. He did just that yesterday, and I count that as an assist missed by João Felix. 

I thought he was a goner but he's definitely rising to the challenge. I think having more options/competition will do him a favour in the long run as he'll start to concentrate on using his best assets to make an impact, rather than trying (and failing) to be the full package over an extended run of games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Siidi said:

No matter what others think I always maintain there is a decent winger in  Mudryk. If I were coaching him I would advise him to cut out the complex dribbling which as we know is overrated in the modern game. 9 out of 10 times you either lose the ball or you end up dribbling your own teammates, and still lose the ball.

Mudryk should perfect beating the offside trap from the shoulder of the fullback and polishing up his crosses - low, high, short, long, etc. He did just that yesterday, and I count that as an assist missed by João Felix. 

In a straight foot race there are not many that can keep up with him. If he can consistently get round the back of a defence and put in a decent cross , it’s all we really ask of him. That is his one job. As you say, forget the dribbles just ‘run Forest run!” 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, paulw66 said:

 

think is was minute 85 yesterday. that learned him. he then kept doing it. 

When the referee does it that late, it’s for crowd appeasement purposes and the masses fall for it. It also wastes another 20-30 seconds whilst they note the booking etc. 

But, they won’t book the keepers earlier as it might give the referee a tough decision later on, and that’s the rub. Too cowardly to do the right thing. I’d include our own team in that as all teams do it when it’s convenient. But we would probably be the first team to suffer, if there was a clampdown. 

As soon as Forest scored, the change in tactics were obvious. They were not ‘getting on with it’ beforehand and afterwards it was painful to watch and see how easy it is to con this set of referees. 

Down for over a minute, automatic sub. Down and stopping normal play, with no trainer required - off the pitch returning in 1 minute.

That might keep some flow. As soon as we upped the tempo yesterday, Forest players did all they could to break up that rhythm. They’re not alone in doing it, Arsenal have been masters at it for many years.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, east lower said:

When the referee does it that late, it’s for crowd appeasement purposes and the masses fall for it. 

 

I think it's also to appease the PGMOL

 I booked him for time wasting. What are you worried about ?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...